Become a research coach

Do you have a strong background in research leadership?

Are you looking for something to do in retirement?

Are you passionate about strengthening research capability in Australia?

Then you may be interested in an exciting opportunity to develop the next generation of researchers.

We are seeking consultant coaches in all Australian states to undertake either direct one to one coaching for researchers, or join a collaborative team to provide institutional solutions such as workshops.

RCA is a unique social enterprise company that brings together expert research leaders with early to mid-career researchers who are seeking individualised support for their careers.  

As an RCA Coach you may be currently retired. You should have experience in research leadership ideally in one of more of the following:

• Professorial roles, leading other staff undertaking research functions.
• State or Federal government experience in senior research functions.
• Senior research positions within NGOs, hospitals and research organisations.

You will:

• Be a professionally qualified and accomplished research leader.
• Have a distinguished record in research.
• Have made significant achievements as a manager of people and in delivering successful outcomes. 
• Have secured competitive funding and / or commissioned research and consultancies.  
• Have demonstrated above all throughout your career a commitment to supporting, developing and mentoring less experienced researchers.  

If you are selected as an RCA coach, your details will be placed on a register of RCA consultant coaches to be drawn on for coaching roles. You will be engaged as an independent consultant and use the RCA Framework, approaches and RCA Tip Sheets to build research capability in Australian research. RCA provides induction and professional support through our Practice Lead.

For more information about RCA: http://researchcoaching.com.au/

If you are interested please contact This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

TEST

University productivity boost would save $500m a year, easily meeting the government's demand for greater efficiency

A productivity boost in universities could save more than the government is trying to cut from university funding. Louise Kennerley by Tim Dodd

Universities can boost productivity to save more than the $1.2 billion the Turnbull government is trying to cut from university funding in the next four years, according to a new study.

Research by economist Keith Houghton shows that if all universities could reach at least 85 per cent of the productivity level attained by Australia's most efficient universities, the university system would save well over $500 million a year, or in excess of $2 billion over four years.

Dr Houghton, a professor emeritus at the Australian National University and a former dean of the ANU College of Business and Economics who has sat on the university's council and finance committee, said that if universities could improve productivity by 2 per cent a year on top of this, it would save another $500 million annually."Universities have demonstrated their ability to enhance efficiency, and what is being asked is to redouble those efforts without compromising the integrity of what is an exceptional higher education and research system," he said.

His analysis comes as universities strenuously oppose the $1.2 billion efficiency dividend announced by federal Education Minister Simon Birmingham in the May budget which strips 2.5 per cent from their teaching subsidies in 2018 and another 2.5 per cent in 2019.

University peak body Universities Australia is furiously lobbying senators to block the cuts, which it claims would push the university system to the "tipping point" where reducing funding would do major damage.

The group said last week that 35 per cent of the $1.2 billion cut would hit STEM [science, technology, engineering and maths] courses, which were critical to Australia's future.

Improve efficiency

Dr Houghton, who will explain his research at this week's Australian Financial Review Higher Education Summit in Sydney, urged universities to target improved efficiency as opposed to trying to improve cash flow by enrolling more students in popular but oversupplied courses.

Dr Houghton, now retired from ANU and holding a position as a principal of Research Coaching Australia, said his work revealed a wide spread in higher education productivity, with many universities clearly having room to improve.

His research measures the productivity of both major outputs of universities – teaching and research – and maps them on a grid which also shows the "productivity frontier" which it is possible to attain.

On the frontier

In 2014, the most efficient universities – which sat on the productivity frontier – were ANU (heavily skewed toward research), the University of Wollongong (an even mixture of research and teaching) and RMIT University (which is skewed more towards teaching).

Dr Houghton measures the volume of research by number of publications in the government's Higher Education Research Data Collection, and the volume of teaching by the full-time equivalent of the number of students enrolled.

Overall, universities are steadily increasing productivity and the productivity frontier has shifted considerably since 2004. His research has found that productivity of Australian universities increased 15 per cent from 2007 to 2013.

Dr Houghton has also begun work on measuring productivity of US and UK universities, and early results show that Australian universities are more efficient on the teaching side.

He said a full-time student "costs" about 1.5 per cent of an academic staff member's time compared to at least 2.5 per cent in the US and the UK, when the result is adjusted to reflect the amount of time staff spent on teaching duties.

He said that Australian universities may have good reasons for low productivity, for example regional universities having a geographic disadvantage.

He also said it was important to obtain more detailed information about individual universities to refine the estimates.

For example, with currently available data, a university appears more productive if it graduates more low-cost students in business courses, compared to high-cost students in science courses, so more granular data is needed.

Dr Houghton said his work was at an early stage and he planned to extend his modelling with more data to build a effective tool for university management, university governing bodies and government to measure productivity performance.